On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:36 PM, James Mckenzie <jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net> wrote: > ... > How about some place on the Wiki along with an implementation status. That > way we can also annotate items that are missing in MSDN (I just re-stumbled > across something in my latest Richedit tests) as well. This would help > greatly in our progress towards current and future implementations of the > Windows API. > > And I agree, adding all of this to the source would make it unwieldy. >
So something like "http://wiki.winehq.org/WineAPI/<DLL>/<Function>" ? If that's acceptable I would not mind a system like that, especially if the links of documented functions are provided in the source. Documenting these things is a lot of work, so I'm not about to run off and do all that work if no-one is ever going to take advantage of it. Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu
