James McKenzie <jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net> writes: > Also, strongly defending your patches without authoritative > information marks you as being arrogant. After a while, your patches > will be ignored. That is not a good place to be in this project.
Your habit of pretending to be an authority in the project, when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about, strikes me as a lot more arrogant than Max (correctly) pointing out that there is a test case already. You are right about one thing, the patches being ignored bit. But it's not to Max that it's going to happen... -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
