Am 26.09.2010 um 12:01 schrieb Vincent Pelletier: > Points on which I would like opinions: > - getting rid of the magic number ~0U or ~((unsigned long) 0)
> - couldn't it actually hide a refcount problem in wine ? Very likely > - if not, then would it be good to extend to other refcounts aswell or include > in [a local wrapper for] InterlockedDecrement ? If the problem is indeed an underflow and not a hidden refcount issue(e.g. separated refcounts on surface versions, that's being worked on) it needs a testcase.