Le 10/11/2010 22:32, Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
Eric Pouech<eric.pou...@orange.fr>  writes:

Le 10/11/2010 17:34, Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
Eric Pouech<eric.pou...@orange.fr>   writes:

msvcr90 doesn't set msvcrt's errno in case of error, while msvcrt does
Hence the wrappers inside msvcr90 around _itoa_s and _itow_s calls.
Do you have an app that depends on this?

no, just the current tests that fail
Then I'd say don't bother replicating that for now. Setting errno when
getting invalid parameters seems quite reasonable.

so we stop testing that we didn't set errno in msvcrN0 for _s functions?
A+

--
Eric Pouech
"The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the 
ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams)



Reply via email to