James McKenzie wrote: > Actually, the latest patch is what I don't want reused.
This one? http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2011-January/098431.html Why don't you want it reused? > And no, you don't put it in the LGPL until it is committed, That's interesting. I always thought it was LGPL'd as soon as it was sent to the patches list... maybe we should add a note to the mailing list description clarifying this. > Besides, I've been a big enough pain that my existence here is > unwarranted and unneeded. Sounds like you're sore from beating your head against the wall trying to get patches in. Sorry to hear it. So long! - Dan