On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:17, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Austin English >> <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> -- >>> -Austin >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> So test.winehq.org doesn't test Win9x any more, but why are we >> throwing away perfectly good Win9x tests that took years to get in? > > Because the code is essentially dead. > > -- > -Austin >
What's the first Git version of Wine on which Win9x tests started being removed? Is it 226c44097b26dcb547d533cb1690f60182d1728e or b7c18d104b2d68a2a07574f01bb306df3fc138d2? It might still be useful to cross-compile tests on the version before that one and sporadically run them against future versions of Wine. And does this mean that Windows 3.1 (and DOS?) tests aren't welcome now? Damjan
