On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 06:32 -0500, Andrew Nguyen wrote: > - DWORD sizeW = *lpSize * 2; > + DWORD sizeW = 0; > + > + GetUserNameW( NULL, &sizeW );
Can we avoid the extra call? > I didn't intend to scoop Dan's work, but I have a version of his fix, > which is attached, with deeper tests which I wrote before Hans expressed > his concerns. Should I just send in the tests with todo_wine and let Dan > fix those, or should I send a revised version and allow a "winner" to be > picked? I vote for getting some tests in first.