On 07/26/11 13:04, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 26 July 2011 10:57, Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> wrote:
>> It's better to test for the exact value in tests like hr == S_OK. It
>> makes tests stricter.
> I don't think that making tests more strict than necessary is a good
> principle.
If there is no cost of having tests more strict (like code
complication), it is a good principle IMO. In this case it's a matter of
choosing the right way for testing results, so it should be preferable.
> (Not that it matters a lot here anyway, for most of these
> D3D_OK is the only possible sucessful return value.)
How can you be sure without tests?
Cheers,
Jacek
