Damjan, I dont believe it is necessary to have separate desktop files for different commands. Just append whatever you need in a new section. I believe chromium does that to differentiate some --flags.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Damjan Jovanovic <damjan....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Nowres Rafid <nowres.ra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I propose to associate .bat and .com files with wine's cmd in GNOME, KDE and >> others >> >> >> > > AFAIK COM files are ancient self-contained real-mode DOS code, with no > ability to load DLLs. Shouldn't they rather be loaded by DOSBox, which > we delegate DOS applications to on the AMD64 architecture anyway? > > BAT files should associate with Wine, but on Windows double-clicking > them runs them in a terminal window (when last I checked). Thus we'd > have to create a new wine-cmd.desktop which associates with BAT files. > I'll look into it. > > While I am at it, EXE files are not clearly Wine's either - they could > be real-mode DOS executables, or .NET code intended for Mono on *nix. > At some point, Wine/Mono/DOSBox and related projects need to have a > talk about some kind of arbitration mechanism. > > Damjan Jovanovic > > >
