On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Ah, I see you resent a fixed version, sorry for the noise.

Thanks just the same. Because of your bot's email, I was able to
know to resend the patch before I ran out the door.

Andrew

> (FWIW, the bot won't test your retry, since it was an incomplete patch 
> series.)
> 
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:10 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder runtests while 
> >> building Wine.
> >> Full details are available at: 
> >> http://buildbot.kegel.com/builders/runtests/builds/161
> >> BUILD FAILED: failed git
> >
> > Something's fishy; looking at
> > http://marc.info/?l=wine-patches&m=131134541100364&w=2
> > I see that the July 22nd version seems to have interesting strings,
> > but the August 31st version has all question marks when it comes to
> > non-ascii text.
> > What happened between the two?
> >
> > http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/78217, which is where I pulled
> > the patch from,
> > also has the question marks.
> >


Reply via email to