> > > This was deliberate - I did that originally and I got a compile warning > as > > one is const WCHAR * and one is const WCHAR[2] (Not sure if that error > was > > from a MSVC windows or Linux compile, but I was trying to avoid it, and a > > typecast was a bit pointless as the above is accurate as well, isnt it?) > > You could declare it non-const. That's often what we end up doing in > the tests, that or casting away the const. > > Whats the difference between a typecast and &var[0]?
Jason
