On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:21, Ken Thomases <k...@codeweavers.com> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Austin English wrote:
>
>> @@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ then
>> saved_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
>> CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wlogical-op -Werror"
>> AC_CACHE_CHECK([for broken string.h that generates warnings with
>> -Wlogical-op], ac_cv_c_logicalop_noisy,
>> - AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#include <string.h>]],
>> [[char*f(const char *h,char n) {return
>> strchr(h,n);}]])],[ac_cv_c_logicalop_noisy=no],[ac_cv_c_logicalop_noisy=yes]))
>> + AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#include <string.h>]],
>> [[char*f(const char *h,char n) {return
>> strchr(h,n)}]])],[ac_cv_c_logicalop_noisy=no],[ac_cv_c_logicalop_noisy=yes]))
>> CFLAGS="$saved_CFLAGS"
>> if test "$ac_cv_c_logicalop_noisy" = "no"
>> then
>
> That doesn't look extraneous to me.
You're right, misread the output from config.log, my mistake.
> Also, static analysis of the configure test programs seems like it would
> produce tons of noise. Those are often not sane programs by normal standards.
Actually, it's mostly clean using Clang..
--
-Austin
