> It's been continously said that any memory sharing scheme between a client > and wineserver won't be accepeted, ever.
You're the second person to make that assertion without pointing out the relevant discussion. Such assertions are not helpful. > You need to make wineserver multithreaded then, and that idea has been > shot down as well. Yes, either wine or wineserver will need a thread to set these values with the required precision. The current question is whether turning on such functionality via a registry setting is acceptable, since it is clearly not okay for the general case.
