Roland McGrath <rol...@hack.frob.com> wrote: > > I've no particular attachment to the name 'xstat'. If you'd prefer > > 'statx' I could go for that. > > I prefer something other than xstat and statx(at) seems acceptable enough. > What I'd really prefer is a name that is less meaninglessly arcane, > but I haven't thought of any good ones.
fileinfoat() perhaps? I think stat*at() is better, though, as people are used to the stat function family. David
