Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > >> You did get a comment from Huw that you need to allocate extra bytes, > >> you still haven't done that AFAICS. > > > > That was a just a question, to which I had answered. There are the tests, > > and the app which needs this functionality (and uses various fonts with > > different font sizes) works just fine with current approach. > > Have you actually tested it with characters 32-pixel wide, and confirmed > that Windows messes them up the same way?
What I have done is a comparison of screenshots of the affected application produced under Windows and Wine. If there will be a need in futher improvements I'll certainly have a look what can be enhanced. > > Besides, > > status of the patches was New, both for the test and this implementation. > > What has this got to do with anything? If your patch receives comments > you have to address them, I'm not going to review it if someone else > already did. Shouldn't the patch status reflect that? Or commenting on a patch automatically makes it rejected? What about the test sent as 1/2? It has got no comments. -- Dmitry.
