2012/10/16 Francois Gouget <fgou...@codeweavers.com>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Christian Costa wrote: > [...] > > >> Why not if I can make it run the test after the extraction. > > >> That said why not improving test bot download extra files? Is there a > > >> specific reason for that? > > > I'm not against improving the testbot, it was just a suggestion. > > > > > It's a good one.I will file a bug in bugzilla for the test bot and try > > your suggestion. > > Do you know any simple tool that enables to do that? > > If the sfx approach can be made to work without changes to WineTestBot > then it may be worth documenting somewhere on the Wiki. > > Otherwise I'd rather modify WineestBot to accept .zip files in addition > to .exe ones. This would cause the zip file to be extracted in a > temporary directory, maybe not allowing subdirectories, and the one .exe > file it contains would be run. I think that process would be more > intuitive. > > If we need to allow more than one exe, letting the user specify the > command to run should resolve any ambiguities. > > > That would be perfect!
