Qian Hong <fract...@gmail.com> writes: > IMO the best solution is to correctly implement RemoveFontResource() > so Bug 8292 will be fixed, then we don't need to worry about the > broken test in usp10, which is the original reason for this patch. > > Would you like me send this patch which is still an improvement, or > just leave the broken test there until RemoveFontResource is > implement?
Either way we probably need to improve handling of font files being deleted unexpectedly. But it's certainly reasonable to implement RemoveFontResource first and then see what remains to be fixed. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
