2013/4/29 Christian Costa <titan.co...@gmail.com>:
>
> ---
>  dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/xfile.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/xfile.c b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/xfile.c
> index 1238bcd..e514a5f 100644
> --- a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/xfile.c
> +++ b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/xfile.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static void test_templates(void)
>      ok(ret == D3DXFERR_BADFILEFLOATSIZE, "RegisterTemplates returned %#x, 
> expected %#x\n", ret, D3DXFERR_BADFILEFLOATSIZE);
>
>      ret = d3dxfile->lpVtbl->RegisterTemplates(d3dxfile, 
> templates_parse_error, sizeof(templates_parse_error) - 1);
> -    todo_wine ok(ret == D3DXFERR_PARSEERROR, "RegisterTemplates returned 
> %#x, expected %#x\n", ret, D3DXFERR_PARSEERROR);
> +    ok(ret == D3DXFERR_PARSEERROR, "RegisterTemplates returned %#x, expected 
> %#x\n", ret, D3DXFERR_PARSEERROR);
>
>      ret = d3dxfile->lpVtbl->RegisterTemplates(d3dxfile, templates, 
> sizeof(templates) - 1);
>      ok(ret == S_OK, "RegisterTemplates failed with %#x\n", ret);

Hi Christian,
good catch for that todo_wine. However, this should be merged with the
patch actually fixing the test (I guess it's patch 2).


Reply via email to