On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Hans Leidekker <h...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > ... > > I don't see why you're still using these defines. It's unlikely that this code > will work if NETLINK_ROUTE is defined but RTMGRP_IPV4_IFADDR isn't, for > example. > > If there are versions of the netlink headers that don't have all of them it > may be possible to work around that (e.g. by defining them ourselves), if not > we can expand the configure check.
I was just trying to use the defines that were in each section of code, since that's generally what I've seen in other places in Wine. I'm happy to standardize on NETLINK_ROUTE though, as I'm unaware of any issues with these features being unavailable in different versions of the headers. As soon as I get a chance I'll update that and resubmit, thanks for all your help! Best, Erich
