On 26 June 2013 03:53, Austin English <austinengl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My understanding was that using the _WIN64 macro was preferred. I can
> certainly do that instead. How's this?
>
I could probably live with that, though perhaps make it a helper
function, and I'm not entirely sure this will print something
meaningful on e.g. ARM. This is really a winex11 patch though, so it's
more something for Alexandre.


Reply via email to