On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Ken Sharp wrote: > > > On 19/07/13 15:00, Rosanne DiMesio wrote: > >On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:55:42 -0500 > >Jeremy White <jwh...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > > > >>Alright folks, I have to confess that the 1.6 release came and I didn't > >>immediately get up and dance. > >> > >>In fact, a new Wine release was almost...boring. > >> > > > >What was most striking to me about this release was the fact that not a > >single bug was targeted to be fixed for 1.6. The practice of nominating bugs > >for specific milestones seems to have been abandoned. I can't help but > >wonder why. > > > > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24611 was added two days ago. > *shrugs*
We noticed too late. ;) But thats software management life, you always have bugs left over when you release. More for 1.6.1 or 1.7.x :) Ciao, Marcus
