Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@baikal.ru> writes: > Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > >> You shouldn't check the version, but the actual problem (i.e. the size >> of the offending type). Also please avoid unnecessary changes. > > The offending type is toff_t, it's size is either 32 or 64-bit depending > on whether it's libtiff 3.0 or 4.0, or whether it's broken 4.0 headers. > So I don't see how checking for the size of toff_t makes it possible to > differentiate between 3.x, 4.x and broken 4.x headers.
You can test TIFF_UINT64_T or something along those lines. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org