On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Charles Davis wrote:

> In the Windows world, "Unicode" almost universally means "UTF-16". So,
> use the well-known UTF-16 type instead of making up our own.
> 
> I have to wonder if there was a good reason Ken didn't use this
> initially.

Please hold this patch while I review it.

I think there is a good reason why I didn't use it, but I have to figure it out 
again. :-/

It has to do with a promised pasteboard type (what Microsoft calls delayed 
rendering) and the conversions to the other text types. I think we need to use 
a custom type to distinguish between being asked for promised data vs. being 
asked for a conversion.

-Ken



Reply via email to