On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:35 PM, André Hentschel wrote: > Am 29.08.2013 19:52, schrieb André Hentschel: >> Hi, >> thank you both for the comments, i'll see what i can do. > > How about that? Much better, but... > > diff --git a/programs/winedbg/info.c b/programs/winedbg/info.c > index c0b86ba..0667ad7 100644 > --- a/programs/winedbg/info.c > +++ b/programs/winedbg/info.c > @@ -244,6 +244,11 @@ void info_win32_module(DWORD64 base) > } > } > } > + else if (strstr(im.mi[i].ModuleName, "<mach-o>")) > + { > + dbg_printf("Mach-O\t"); > + module_print_info(&im.mi[i], FALSE); If there are any modules embedded in a Mach-O file (i.e. the PE DLLs embedded in a Wine built-in DLL), this will no longer print them. > + } > else > { > /* check module is not embedded in another module */
Chip