Am Donnerstag, 5. September 2013, 21:12:37 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov: > Wolfgang Walter <w...@stwm.de> wrote: > > > Does 'make test' pass without failures for you? > > > > Without patch 1/2 and 2/2 I get for > > > > $ ../../../tools/runtest -P wine -M kernel32.dll -T ../../.. -q -p > > kernel32_test.exe.so comm.c > > > > fixme:comm:set_queue_size insize 1024 outsize 1024 unimplemented stub > > err:comm:set_line_control ByteSize > > fixme:ntdll:server_ioctl_file Unsupported ioctl 1b000c (device=1b access=0 > > func=3 method=0) comm.c:2029: Tests skipped: interactive tests (set > > WINETEST_INTERACTIVE=1) > The tests pass without any failures. > > > With my patches 1/2 and 2/2 I get: > > > > fixme:iphlpapi:NotifyAddrChange (Handle 0x10ee8e0, overlapped 0x10ee8ec): > > stub wine: configuration in '/home/walterw/.wine' has been updated. > > fixme:comm:set_queue_size insize 1024 outsize 1024 unimplemented stub > > comm.c:857: Test succeeded inside todo block: WaitCommEvent failed with a > > timeout comm.c:881: Test succeeded inside todo block: WaitCommEvent error > > 997 comm.c:883: Test succeeded inside todo block: WaitCommEvent: expected > > EV_TXEMPTY, got 0x4 comm.c:889: Test succeeded inside todo block: > > WaitCommEvent used 1141 ms for waiting err:comm:set_line_control ByteSize > > fixme:ntdll:server_ioctl_file Unsupported ioctl 1b000c (device=1b access=0 > > func=3 method=0) comm.c:2036: Tests skipped: interactive tests (set > > WINETEST_INTERACTIVE=1) > Successes inside of todo_wine blocks are treated as failres.
So you think I should remove the wine_todos already here? Regards, -- Wolfgang Walter Studentenwerk München Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts Abteilungsleiter IT Leopoldstraße 15 80802 München