On 06/09/13 17:12, Frédéric Delanoy wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Andrew Cook <aris...@gmail.com> wrote: >> --- >> dlls/ntdll/tests/Makefile.in | 1 + >> dlls/ntdll/tests/job.c | 151 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/winnt.h | 5 ++ >> 3 files changed, 157 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 dlls/ntdll/tests/job.c > > + if(pNtIsProcessInJob) > + todo_wine todo_wine ok(pNtIsProcessInJob(pi[0].hProcess, > JobObject) == STATUS_PROCESS_NOT_IN_JOB, > + "NtIsProcessInJob: expected STATUS_PROCESS_NOT_IN_JOB, > got %x\n", ret); > > Is that double todo_wine intended? It seems weird... >
I have no idea how i missed that. probably better this patch is disregarded, i've sent an equivalent set of tests for kernel32.