Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@baikal.ru> writes: > Nikolay Sivov <bungleh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> It looks like it belongs to kernel32/tests. >> > Since actual access checks are done by ntdll APIs I believe that >> > ntdll/tests >> > is appropriate place, kernel32 file APIs are just wrappers around the >> > tested >> > functionality. >> > >> It doesn't matter what it uses internally. You're testing kernel32 calls. > > What are you trying to prove? Half of the calls in that file are using > kernel32 APIs, that doesn't mean that they need to be moved to kernel32 > or that they are doing something wrong.
Using kernel32 APIs in order to test the ntdll ones is fine. But a test that only calls kernel32 has no reason to be in ntdll. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
