On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 7:44 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > >> What I was trying to mention is that, in the context of graduation, we >> need "at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single >> company or entity that is vital to the success of the project". We do >> have it, but most of them became inactive last year. What you seem to >> be saying is to don't count on those and only consider the active >> committers as the dev community. Did I get it right ? Anyway, I'll >> make the updates on the current report... > > Well, I was really trying to interpret the concern that Ant raised in the > previous graduation discussion. I like the report in current form. I've > signed off… Thanks Luciano! > > --kevan
"...talks had halted as one member has not agreed to proceed with graduation..." thats a little harsh, I just questioned the level of activity and said it would be an easier decision if Wink was more active. ...ant
