Hi Daniel, On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Just an aside, this is something that the CXF JAX-RS implementation would > love to have as well. CXF currently does not have anything gson related. > With CXF being used as the JAX-RS implementation for TomEE/JAX-RS, there > could be a lot of people that could benefit from it. > What you suggest is implement gson support for CXF or if i implement a new provider for wink using gson there is a feasibility to add it to CXF too? > If it can be made "generic" enough (maybe just using the JAX-RS api's) it > may be something that the two implementations could share. Or maybe work > on becoming a committer on both Wink and CXF. :-) > > Seriously, there is a severe lack of cooperation between Wink and CXF. > Both projects could likely benefit if there was more cooperation. > As i am not familiar with CXF I will go through CXF documentations too.But if you could explain the scenario(how we can use wink implementations for CXF) here it would be helpful to me to understand the process. Thanks, Shameera. > > Dan > > > > > Other than that i would like to be familiar with the code base. If > somebody > > can point out few potential bugs to fix in startup that would be a great > > help. > > > > [0] > > > https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/shameera/18002 > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3967 > > > > Thanks, > > Shameera. > > > > -- > > Shameera Rathnayaka > > Undergraduate > > Department of Computer Science and Engineering > > University of Moratuwa. > > Sri Lanka. > > > > Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] - http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com > > -- Shameera Rathnayaka Undergraduate Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Moratuwa. Sri Lanka. Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
