thanks :) NIcolas
2017-06-14 16:13 GMT+02:00 Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: >> Will keep a kworker at 100% CPU, even after that command completes? >> I'm unable to reproduce this here. Could you give me detailed >> environmental information so that I can reproduce this precisely? >> Something minimal and easily reproducable would be preferred. > > Okay, I have a working reproducer now, and I've isolated the issue to > the xt_hashlimit garbage collector, an issue outside the WireGuard > code base. I might look for a work around within WireGuard, however. > I'll keep you posted. _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard