> On Jun 14, 2019, at 1:09 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
> I'm leaning toward Steven's suggestion of nixing addconf and making
> setconf behave like syncconf.
But wouldn't the current 'setconf' (overwrite existing) always be faster than a
combo 'setconf/syncconf' (sync with existing) ?
I have this nagging feeling that both 'setconf' and 'syncconf' should exist, if
not for efficiencies but for unforeseen reasons related to the different
functionalities: Start 'setconf' and Reload 'syncconf'.
Lonnie
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
