Hello, Today I noticed there are kernel threads named "wg-crypt-wgX" (the latter part being name of the interface). However when there is actual load on WG, these don't seem to be active, and in "top" we still see a bunch of "kworker/0:X" using the CPU.
Would it be possible to give those kworkers recognizable names instead? I remember Btrfs had a change like this in the past, first they had all kworkers, and now a whole assortment of threads like "btrfs-cleaner", "btrfs-transacti" or "btrfs-endio-met" (there's some strict length limit). -- With respect, Roman _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
