On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 8:13 PM Jordan Glover <golden_mille...@protonmail.ch> wrote: > > On Friday, December 6, 2019 5:35 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> > wrote: > > > Looks like an arch problem or a libnftnl problem. I've made a minimal > > reproducer: > > > > printf 'filter\nCOMMIT\nraw\nCOMMIT\n*mangle\nCOMMIT\n' | sudo > > iptables-nft-restore -n > > > > I filed a bug report on Arch: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64755 > > You can follow up with them. > > I tried to compile myself iptables 1.8.4 which is latest upstream version > and have good and bad news: > > The good one is your minimal reproducer no longer causes segfault. > > The bad one is wg-quick still does: > > wg-quick[2325]: [#] iptables-restore -n > audit[2326]: ANOM_ABEND auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 ses=4294967295 > subj==unconfined pid=2326 comm="iptables-restor" > exe="/usr/bin/xtables-nft-multi" sig=11 res=1 > wg-quick[2325]: /usr/bin/wg-quick: line 29: 2326 Segmentation fault > (core dumped) "$@" > kernel: show_signal_msg: 40 callbacks suppressed > kernel: iptables-restor[2326]: segfault at 0 ip 000069bb4df13cc9 sp > 0000716fcc5b9b30 error 4 in libnftnl.so.11.2.0[69bb4df11000+18000] > kernel: Code: 15 5c 20 02 00 48 85 c0 74 07 48 89 00 48 89 40 08 48 83 c4 08 > c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd 53 48 83 ec 08 <48> 8b 3f 48 > 8b 1f 48 39 fd 74 2f 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 47 08 48 89 43 > > Maybe upstream found and fixed some regression but still missed > the other one.
Can you craft a new minimal reproducer? _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard