On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 07:58:48 -0500 Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm testing wireguard > wireguard-0.0.20191219-2.fc31.x86_64 > between a Fedora 31 client and server, comparing to openvpn. > > Openvpn is running between a linux client outside my lan and a server on my > router, which is running dd-wrt. > I'm pinging between that linux client and another linux client within my > lan. > > wireguard is running between the same linux client outside my lan and the > same other linux client within my lan. This > time router is simply forwarding packets via NAT. > > Openvpn ping times are much lower (about 10ms) and much lower variance than > wireguard. Wireguard pings > are all over the place. > > Packets coming in from the WAN are traversing some firewall that I don't > control, which may be affecting results. Openvpn > is config to use udp. > > Any ideas? Did you try using the same port for WG, as you use for OpenVPN (of course stopping OpenVPN for a while to try that)? It is possible that ISPs employ different priorities for particular UDP port ranges; Or they might do load-balancing across multiple links by src/dst/port/protocol, and your WG's combination of that randomly happens to go via some unlucky overloaded one. -- With respect, Roman _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
