> Reduce MTU of the WG interfaces to accomodate for overhead. See > https://www.mail-archive.com/wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com/msg01856.html for > calculations of by how much. Ok but why all of a sudden, I'll go thought the process again and see. >> inet6 addr: 2506:c500:ff4:1::aa/64 Scope:Global > I wonder what's this IP range, is this some VPN service? Squatting on > unassigned IPs within 2000::/3 seems like a very bad practice. If they wanted > an imaginary GUA for their NAT66, I'd suggest something like 66::/16 instead. > I have a ipv6 range allocated, I changed the ip before posting.
I'm routing my part of my class C and a small part of my ipv6 range from my DC to my home. Mike