Thus spake Lee Badman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:47:51PM
-0500:
> Wondering if anyone in the group cares to hazard a theory.
Sure, as long as you don't hold me to it!
Sounds like IAPP is freaking out. I've heard rumors of this.
I think for example, you can get an IAPP storm by putting a
loopback interface on an IOS ap in heavyweight mode.
In general, cisco ap's aren't known for scaling to high numbers
of AP's on the same subnet due to this sort of chatter between
them and the amount of state info they all think they need to
carry. So, I would look hard at splitting up into a lot more
layer 3.
See if sh iapp statistics as any clues.
Did you get a sniffer trace? I think ethereal can decode IAPP.
Make sure you filter IAPP with ACL's where needed, too.
Can you enable multicast storm control on the 3500 platform?
I wouldn't exactly expect this to get fixed either since Cisco
is basicly throwing away everything and trying again with the
company they bought to replace aironet. IMHO, of course.
Dale
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dale W. Carder - Network Engineer | DoIT Network Services
University of Wisconsin at Madison | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(608) 263-3628 | 24hr NOC: 263-4188 | http://net.doit.wisc.edu/~dwcarder
**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
