Lee,

I think you are right on. I think as long as your a/b/g network is working
well, the students aren't going to care about 11n. In my mind this is still
a very immature technology. I think it would be very hard to demonstrate any
noticeable benefit to a typical student using wireless. Sure, you are going
to see them coming in with 11n on laptops next fall, but my understanding is
that it will be backwards compatible with abg. I  wouldn't consider it at
this point unless I was starting from scratch, and even then I think it
would be a tough call. BTW, Meru claims to have 11n and I think I heard
Aruba has it or is about to release an 11n solution as well. We are
concentrating more on increasing our coverage for now, and watching and
waiting on 11n. We may do a small pilot this summer. 

Pete Morrissey

 

  _____  

From: Lee Weers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:42 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0

 

For wireless we currently have an Aruba 2400, and a HP WESM xl module.
About a year ago I did a comparison (mostly on paper) of a campus wide
deployment of Aruba, Trapeze, Procurve, Xirrus, Cisco, and Siemens.  It came
down to Procurve for several reasons.  1.  It is very simple to setup and
maintain.  2.  It has supported 802.1x a lot easier than our Aruba
deployment  3.  It is the least expensive to maintain year over year
(Lifetime warranty).

 

The only reason why he is pushing Cisco is they are shipping N now, and he
is concerned there will be a politically backlash from the students with the
technology fee increase.

 

My opinion is the students won't care if it is a/b/g or n.  They just want
wireless.

 

  _____  

From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:36 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0

Hi Lee-

 

I would encourage an eyes-open, non-biased bake-off if you have no wireless
now. Regardless of what APs you settle on, scrutinize the management
component closely. You may end up with a whiz-bang WLAN, but if you become a
slave to the management tool, you'll likely be looking for alternatives not
too far down the road. The management component (and the hidden costs that
you'd do well to ferret out before purchasing by grilling others who have
gone before you), add a significant amount to your TCO. 

 

For us, we're seeing what early adopters have to say on 802.11n. Especially
large schools with thousands of APs that also do 802.1x. You probably
realize that 802.11n can impact your PoE and data wiring strategy, along
with the number of APs, etc. 

 

 

Keep us posted as you proceed. Out of curiosity- did the push for Cisco by
your supervisor come after a comparison with other vendors?

 

Regards-

 

Lee

 

Lee H. Badman

Wireless/Network Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Syracuse University

315 443-3003

  _____  

From: Lee Weers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:25 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n Draft 2.0

 

We are looking at a campus wide wireless deployment, and my supervisor is
pushing for a complete Cisco 1252 with N draft 2.0 capability.  We would
have about a total of 250 to 300 AP's in full deployment.  Our wired
infrastructure is currently 100% Procurve with about 90% of it being 10/100
switched.  I'd like to know what other schools are doing with 802.11n.

Thank you, 
  
Lee Weers 
Assistant Director for Network Services 
Central College IT Services 
(641) 628-7675 

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription
information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found
at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to