FYI - this still appears to be an LWAPP recovery/upgrade image...how can they
get away with not having IOS? What about Hybrid Mode support?


Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare 
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | [email protected] | 
149 13th Street, 10th Floor, Mailstop 10055B, Charlestown, Ma  02129


-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce T
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Aironet 1140 vs 1250

Hi Everyone,
 
The following Cisco wireless LAN software was recently published:
    
IOS             
 
c1140-rcvk9w8-tar.124-18a.JA1.tar 
 
http://ftp-sj.cisco.com/swc/esd/02/crypto/3DES/282439881/contract/c1140-rcvk9w8-
tar.124-18a.JA1.tar
<https://phsexchweb.partners.org/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://ftp-sj.cisco.c
om/swc/esd/02/crypto/3DES/282439881/contract/c1140-rcvk9w8-tar.124-18a.JA1.tar>

 
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare 
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | [email protected]

________________________________

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of Earl
Barfield
Sent: Tue 2/17/2009 5:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Aironet 1140 vs 1250



> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:09:59 -0600 From: Rob Crockett
> <[email protected]> Subject: Cisco Aironet 1140 vs 1250
>
> I'm interested in knowing experiences others have had in deploying
> the = new Cisco Aironet 1140s.


I've got an AP1140 for eval and the biggest reason that I haven't done
more with it is because it requires version 5.2 software on the Wireless
Lan Controllers.  Look back a month or so in the list archives for the
religious wars about 4.2 vs 5.x, etc.

The AP1142 is more aesthetically pleasing and a bit cheaper than the
AP1252 so I'm sure we'll end up using them eventually just like we
switched from AP1200 to AP1130s when the AP1130s came out.  It's just a
matter of getting to the 5.2 code, which has some significant changes in
how you select which APs carry which SSIDs.  WLAN override is either
gone or different in 5.2.  I think you're supposed to use WLAN AP Groups
instead.

The Cisco PWRINJ3 power injectors that we use for the AP1200 and AP1130
do not work with the AP1140 so you have to buy the more expensive
PWRINJ4 unless you have 802.1af capable POE switches or some other power
injector (mid-span) solution.

Also, there is no IOS (thick) version of code for the AP1140 which makes
site-surveying with it considerably more difficult.  I guess you have to
lug a controller around with you or otherwise arrange for connectivity
from a survey AP back to a controller.  Alternatives there include
predictive site surveys, surveying with an AP1250 and hoping that they
are similar, or just guessing at AP placement.

BTW, there is a pricing promotion on the ten-pack of AP1142s through the
end of April.  I think it's 10% off on the APs but the power injectors
are not discounted so its a little less than 10% off overall.

--
Earl Barfield -- Academic & Research Tech / Information Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
Internet: [email protected]    [email protected]

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to