Thanks Jason and Mike.

Great feedback. We have our Network Security folks administer RADIUS, so I'm
trying to gauge operational impact. How much time do you think this adds to the
workload? Are there flexible wildcard-match options?

Regards,

Bruce T. Johnson | Partners Healthcare 
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 
Pager: 31633 | bjohns...@partners.org 
149 13th Street, 10th Fl., 10055B 
Charlestown, Ma 02129 

________________________________

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Sent: Fri May 15 22:28:38 2009
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLAN Deployment-High number of users 


This depends on your implementation.  

If you don't do Auth vlans, and just do straight vlan switching (like the
article I linked) you can be placed on a VLAN based on many things.  We use
Group membership here.

No DHCP delay in that configuration.


On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jason Appah <jason.ap...@oit.edu> wrote:


        The only thing about that is training your users to accept the limited
or no connectivity state when connecting to the assigned vlan…

         

        From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Mike King
        Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 12:04 PM

        To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
        
        Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLAN Deployment-High number of users

         

        You don't mention if your using 802.1x, but if you are, you can utilize
"Vlan Override".

         

        
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09
186a0080665ceb.shtml

         

        which allows you to throw users int specific VLAN's based on RADIUS
return attributes.  All off the same SSID.

         

        Mike

        On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Jason Appah <jason.ap...@oit.edu>
wrote:

        You could still get away with that with FAT AP's
        
        That is since they are autonomous, you could assign different vlans and
        in turn different ip scopes to the same ssid as they are all unawares of
        each other.

        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv

        [mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Irey
        Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:27 AM
        To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

        Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLAN Deployment-High number of users
        
        Not sure if Cisco has anything like this but Aruba has vlan pooling
        which
        allows multiple vlans to be assigned to the same SSID and the algorithm
        will
        assign clients to each vlan based on that. That works well if you want
        to
        continue to broadcast the same ssid over all of campus. Not sure if
        Cisco
        does anything similar.
        
        We have multiple profiles here (per building) all using the same ssid
        but
        depending on what AP you associate to you will get assigned that profile
        which has the vlan assignment.
        
        Scott Irey
        Network & Telecom Systems Engineer
        Oakland University
        Office: 248.370.2808
        Mobile: 248.505.9827
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
        [mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of reflect ocean
        Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 1:52 PM
        To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
        Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLAN Deployment-High number of users
        
        Hi I run a medium-sized wifi network.We are cisco shop
        (autonommous access points).Recently wifi users number have reached
        limits we didn't expect.Because of that,we had to adjust our subnet
        network in order to support more users associated to the only SSID our
        wireless network use.
        
        I've been looking for alternative to create another ssid and associate
        it to another different subnet but I can't find any related to.
        
        Our wireless lan is currently reaching 1000 users or so.I'm not very
        confortable with the idea  of having such number of users in wireless
        subnet.
        We have deployed around 60 cisco autonomous acess points throughout
        the campus and this subnet is firewalled and routed in our core switch
        which is a hope away to accessing Internet.It's very simple design.
        What would be a recommended deployment in this case with a growing
        number of users?
        Would deploying lwap bring any advantage to this design? We want to
        keep a single ssid and mobility for wireless users.
        Would mesh network bring any benefit?
        
        Thank you
        
        **********
        Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
        Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
        
        **********
        Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
        Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
        
        **********
        Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

         

        ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

        ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

        


********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 



The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to