We keep our APs on separate vlan/ip space and users on subnets that are "wireless traffic" only. If there are issues with a particular user I know from ip address right away if they are wired or wireless. Plus having the wired and wireless users share the same IP space allows them to "poke around" and cause havoc on each other.
Many of our wired user vlans are behind firewalls and VRFs which can be troublesome to troubleshoot if APs are down of can't tunnel back to the controller and since I don't have access to the firewalls (diff team) I'd rather not have to traverse them. Ken Connell Intermediate Network Engineer Computer & Communication Services Ryerson University 350 Victoria St RM AB50 Toronto, Ont M5B 2K3 416-979-5000 x6709 -----Original Message----- From: Craig Simons <craigsim...@sfu.ca> Sender: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:30:50 To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Reply-to: Craig Simons <craigsim...@sfu.ca> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless design Bruce, For administrative reasons, we find it very helpful to have all our wireless users contained to "wireless only" IP ranges. This way, we can configure our IPS/IDS sensors, packet inspectors, etc to keep a more suspicious eye on wireless users (ie unmanaged, potentially dirty laptops) . We also don't have to worry about ensuring there are enough free IP addresses in each particular location to handle any potential transient surges (like during a large conference for example). Regards, Craig SFU SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Network Services Craig Simons Network and Systems Administrator Phone: 778-782-8036 Cell: 604-649-7977 Email: craigsim...@sfu.ca Twitter: simonscraig ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike King" <m...@mpking.com> To: WIRELESS-LAN@listserv.educause.edu Sent: Wednesday, 8 June, 2011 18:15:06 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless design The real short answer is that it does not matter what the IP address of the AP is, as long as it has good stable communications with the controller. What I personally try to do is what you are proposing, put the APs for each building/floor it's own subnet. Good luck Mike On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Entwistle, Bruce < bruce_entwis...@redlands.edu > wrote: We will soon be migrating our wireless network from Cisco autonomous 1231 APs to a combination of Cisco 3502i along with some of the existing 1231 APs converted to lightweight. As we prepare for this we are looking at how to best architect the new network. The new network will cover the entire campus which consists of approx 50 buildings, with each building having its’ own VLAN. The initial idea was to install the APs so the IP address of the AP would be a part of the local building VLAN. This is the IP the AP would use to talk back to the controller. For user connections there would be two VLANs created which would be accessed through a single SSID. The users would then be dynamically assigned to one of the two VLANs based on their logon credentials. Currently all users are placed on the same VLAN after authentication, as our current installation is not capable of dynamic VLAN assignment. There is currently only a single SSID in place. I would be interested to know what other have done and how successful it was. Thank you Bruce Entwistle Network Manager University of Redlands ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/ . ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.