That's what I've got in place now, but it also costs because of the yearly license fees. It hasn't been 100% reliable, either (interference on 2.4MHz, I'm pretty sure), so going 5 is desirable.
John On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Ian McDonald <i...@st-andrews.ac.uk> wrote: > A pair of (cisco) access points from your scrap pile in bridge mode? 100% > inexpensive J > > > > -- > > ian > > > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *John Rodkey > *Sent:* 05 April 2016 22:36 > *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] backhaul wifi comparison/suggestions > > > > I have need for a fairly inexpensive, low bandwidth (10Mbps), short > distance (<200 ft) point to point wireless connection . > > I am aware of the Cambrium ePMP 1000 and Ubiquiti nano. > > Would anyone like to compare these items or propose other good solutions > to this type of situation? > > John > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE > Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
