Using it yes. Happily, no. Much better than it was (I am told), but leaves a lot to be desired. “A work in Progress” would be my summation.
Ian Lyons Network Engineer Rollins College From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Oliver Elliott Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:49 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Prime Infrastructure Validated Alternatives Is anyone even happily using PI? On 10 January 2017 at 15:33, Lee H Badman <lhbad...@syr.edu<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu>> wrote: This comes up on occasion, and I'm hoping to hear actual cases of users, versus "have you heard about blah blah blah?" For large Cisco WLAN environments on the list, is anyone happily and effectively using non-homegrown wireless management other than Prime Infrastructure? Regards, Lee Lee Badman | Network Architect | CWNE #200 Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003 f 315.443.4325 e lhbad...@syr.edu<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu> w its.syr.edu<http://its.syr.edu> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu<http://syr.edu> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss. -- Oliver Elliott Senior Network Specialist IT Services, University of Bristol t: 0117 39 (41131) ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
