Hello John, Redline.
Barry Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 8:49:52 AM, you wrote: JS> Is there anyone who is using anything other than Trango who sees this JS> same issue? JS> Scriv JS> Mark Koskenmaki wrote: >>I"m on the other end of the country - Oregon... >> >>I saw no changes in my 5 ghz stuff. Solar activity would have an impact >>here too, right? how long does the influence last? >> >> >> >>North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061 >>personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net >>sales inquiries to: purchasing at neofast dot net >>Fast Internet, NO WIRES! >>---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>- >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <wireless@wispa.org> >>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 10:28 AM >>Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.8 GHz PtP - weaker RSLs >> >> >> >> >>>On 2 Aug 2005 at 12:56, Brian Webster wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Since different people saw the same problem in multiple locations I >>>> >>>> >>would >> >> >>>>suspect a propagation problem, probably as a result of solar activity. >>>> >>>> >>>While possible, there's one thing that just makes that sound really weird. >>> >>>We're using Trango gear as well, and (as Scriv mentioned) saw some similar >>>problems last night... >>> >>>One of our Trango APs has two client SUs associated. Both links are about >>> >>> >>nine >> >> >>>miles, but the endpoints are only about three miles apart, on the same >>> >>> >>state >> >> >>>highway. Think of it as a "V" shape, where the AP is at the bottom of the >>> >>> >>V. >> >> >>>And the V is actually pointing west-to-east. But whatever. >>> >>>One of those links went completely bananas, lost about 10dB of signal, >>> >>> >>dropped >> >> >>>connection all over the place. The other didn't skip a beat. >>> >>>I have another, similar, link that did the same thing last night. One AP, >>> >>> >>three >> >> >>>SUs. One went bonkers, the other two were things of beauty and perfection. >>>Again, the endpoints are only a couple miles apart. >>> >>>[newbie mode ON!] >>> >>>Is solar flare activity really sufficiently "random" that this is >>> >>> >>plausible? >> >> >>>With clients on the same frequency, and so relatively close together, I'd >>>expect any really broad-scale interference to knock them all off at the >>> >>> >>same >> >> >>>time, instead of just doing so randomly. >>> >>>David Smith >>>MVN.net >>>-- >>>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >>> >>>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >>>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >>> >>> >> >> >> -- Best regards, Barry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
