Well, for the most part we look out for each other, don't step on each
others toes, don't lock people out of our networks, ect. We don't need
to be all regulated. We are doing a fine job as is. WISPs don't do the
same things the bells do. Or maybe I don't exactly know what regulation
means.
Charles Wu wrote:
How are WISPs self-regulated?
-Charles
-------------------------------------------
WISPNOG Park City, UT
http://www.wispnog.com
August 15-17, 2005
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fwd: FCC expected toofficially
proposeDSLderegulationonThursday
I feel that we are kind of self regulated, where as the "big boys", when
left unregulated, go crazy.
Charles Wu wrote:
<snip>
If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I
would NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from
customer to carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it... </snip>
So here's the caveat...
If you refuse to be regulated, then you shouldn't complain when the FCC
rewrites the rules and stops regulating phone/cable incumbents
You can't have "double standards" - and they can always put up a
super-mesh network and trash your spectrum (in Chicago, SBC DSL modems
now come w/ WiFi access points turned on broadcasting away...sure, it's
a convenience to the consumers, but I cannot but wonder if this is an
"insidious method" of trashing 2.4 muni-wifi / wisp networks)
-Charles
-------------------------------------------
WISPNOG Park City, UT
http://www.wispnog.com
August 15-17, 2005
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
