I for one would prefer that we maintain some semblance of focus on our
core focus as an organization (promoting and improving the wireless
industry). I could sell Amway and consider that to be an additional
revenue stream for my WISP, but having me ramble on about that is the
last thing anyone here should have to be subjected to.
The last thing we need on this list is more noise to drown our our
signal, whether that noise is discussion that is relatively unrelated to
the wireless industry (like the original post) or plain old "I don't
like this or that so I'm leaving" drama.
Thanks for nipping this one Rick. Keep up the good work.
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
I am leaving WISPA too, this list has been going downhill for a while
and this NAZI tactic monitoring is starting to become annoying.
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
114 S. Walnut St.
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alex Huppenthal
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New revenue stream *THREAD CLOSED!*
my apologies to the members of the list if they found it offensive.
Reality is we need to consider content rules as much as need to
consider VoIP gateways.
since you've arbitrarily decided its not 'proper content' based on
your view, I've decided to drop my involvement in WISPA. bye
On Mar 7, 2006, at 9:35 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Alex,
Please take this offlist. This is not proper content for
discussion on the
Wispa list servs.
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
President
Supernova Technologies, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Founding Member of WISPA
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of A. Huppenthal
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 8:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] New revenue stream
I have client who asked me if a tasteful nude picture web server would
be okay to deploy on the network.
They are willing to pay 5 times the normal rate for co-location, plus
additional fees for high load times.
When I called Qwest to find out about their policy they said they
aren't
in the business of clensing the net or otherwise filtering content.
Since this server is not one of the companies, I wonder what sort of
liability exists..
It appears this is a huge source of revenue. In fact the same crew
says
they want to provide DRM downloadable movies of the adult nature.
Now I've watched with some interest, what the major hotel chains are
doing and how much pay per view adult movies add to their bottom
line. I
don't think this is a simple - you know I don't like it myself -
answer. Its policy, revenue and finding the proper ground.
Any experience with this?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
