I know we keep working on our processes to improve the installation of
our links. We still have a "burn-in" period after installations because
our processes aren't yet 100%. I think it would be great if we could
together work up a documented procedure to ensure better wireline
reliability of wireless links.
-Matt
John Scrivner wrote:
Well engineered links with proper installation, lightning protection,
battery backup and good gear will be just as reliable (if not more) as
any land line system in my opinion. The rub is that many wireless
links are poorly engineered, bad gear and not installed well. Garbage
in...garbage out. I am just as guilty as anyone else. I am fixing that
though. I have wireless links that are getting to be as reliable as
wired ones. I will be "better than wired" reliably here in a year. The
cost factor puts wireless well ahead of any risk/reward or value
comparisons to other broadband platforms. Wireless will be the clear
winner in the end if we all learn to do it right and buy good gear.
Scriv
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
