<snip> Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier market, not the WISP market. </snip> Ah, the "mis-perceptions" of the "rugged" metal enclosure =) Steve, can you please explain why carriers would prefer a CSMA/CA over a scheduled (WiMAX-like) MAC? Thanks -Charles ------------------------------------------- CWLab Technology Architects http://www.cwlab.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Stroh Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:05 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP Thanks, Steve On Apr 11, 2006, at 18:55, Dylan Oliver wrote: > How is any product qualified as 'Carrier-Grade'? What is it about > Alvarion VL that makes the cut vs. Canopy? Lord knows Motorola > produces far more 'Carrier-Grade' equipment than Alvarion ever will - > so where did they go wrong with Canopy? > > Also, I've heard lately several complaints that Waverider has trouble > sustaining even 1 Mbps throughput ... what is your experience, John? > > Best, > -- > Dylan Oliver > Primaverity, LLC-- --- Steve Stroh 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
