Sure would be nice if I could get the City here to backhaul their tropos
units with something other than 5.2/5.8. Im sure something is available for
City use. I did see a new Alvarion flat panel show up last week at a fire
station, no telling what freq though. They were using canopy.
Superior Wireless
New Orleans,La.
www.superior1.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>;
<isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 10:52 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Re: Six public-safety groups support reallocating 700 MHz
spectrum, but have yet to endorse Cyren plan


> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure about other parts of the country, but here in Idaho they
> have been using 700mhz for city/county emergency services. Many towers
> have expensive ($100k) point to point links to feed the system, and then
> a full rack of equipment inside. The idea is that every emergency
> service would be able to communicate with each other using only 1 radio.
> They will also have voice and data services from that same radio, and
> it's fully roaming.
>
> I only know of two towers with it running, but there are plans to
> install several more systems this summer.
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Dawn DiPietro wrote:
>
> >
> > By Jeffrey Silva
> > May 12, 2006
> > WASHINGTON—Law enforcement and first-responder groups asked key Senate
> > lawmakers to consider a private-sector plan to designate a block of
> > spectrum in the 700 MHz band for a national wireless broadband
> > public-safety network, one that would be shared with commercial
> > wireless carriers and include an interoperability capability
> > policy-makers have repeatedly call for—without success—since the Sept.
> > 11, 2001, terrorists attacks.
> >
> > “We are dedicated to ensuring that public safety has access to the
> > most advanced technology to support those services that meet its
> > stringent requirements to provide safety and security to all
> > Americans. Congress and the [Federal Communications Commission] cannot
> > afford to pass an opportunity to explore the availability of an
> > additional 30 megahertz of spectrum that would meet public safety’s
> > needs as well as elevate the safety of all Americans,” stated the
> > organizations in a letter to Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted
> > Stevens (R-Alaska) and the panel’s ranking Democrat, Sen. Daniel
> > Inouye (Hawaii).
> >
> > The letter was signed by officials of the Association of Public-Safety
> > Communications Officials-International, International Association of
> > Chiefs of Police, International Association of Fire Chiefs, Major
> > Cities Chiefs Association, Major County Sheriffs’ Association and
> > National Sheriffs’ Association.
> >
> > The groups said they are studying the proposal submitted by Cyren Call
> > Communications Inc. to the FCC late last month, and have not decided
> > whether to endorse it. “However,” they stated, “we do believe that the
> > concept of reallocating the 30 megahertz of spectrum in the 700 MHz
> > band in a manner that would promote interoperable, public-safety
> > broadband communications is worthy of public discussion.”
> >
> > A public debate that could prompt lawmakers to reconsider plans to
> > auction by February 2008 valuable spectrum in the 747-762 MHz and
> > 777-792 MHz bands is precisely what the cell-phone industry wants to
> > avoid.
> >
> > Mobile-phone carriers are keenly aware of how Cyren Chairman Morgan
> > O’Brien won over policy-makers in the late 1980s when he presented the
> > then-radical idea of cobbling together narrow radio dispatch
> > frequencies to create Nextel Communications Inc. (now part of Sprint
> > Nextel Corp.). Nextel became a competitor to the cellular duopoly at
> > that time. National mobile-phone carrier executives have not forgotten
> > either about Nextel’s successful campaign to remedy interference
> > Nextel caused to 800 MHz radio systems in a way that secured Nextel 10
> > megahertz of spectrum in the 1.9 GHz band.
> >
> > Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman of the House telecom and Internet
> > subcommittee, is the only lawmaker to publicly voice outright
> > opposition to Cyren’s proposal. Upton did so shortly after Cyren
> > submitted its proposal to the FCC on April 27. The Michigan lawmaker
> > argued the plan would disrupt the balance in legislation that forced
> > broadcasters to surrender 700 MHz as part of their transition to
> > digital technology, set aside 24 megahertz for public safety and
> > earmarked $1 billion for public-safety interoperability deployment.
> > The 24 megahertz already reserved for public safety is adjacent to the
> > separate, clear chunk of 30 megahertz at the heart of Cyren’s
> > initiative. The 30 megahertz is potentially worth billions of dollars
> > in auction receipts for the U.S. Treasury. In addition to mobile-phone
> > carriers, wireless Internet and computer firms have expressed interest
> > in the 700 MHz spectrum to drive WiMAX and other wireless broadband
> > technologies.
> >
> > “While the FCC is currently exploring whether its rules should be
> > modified to permit broadband use in a portion of the 24 megahertz now
> > allotted for wideband use, that will only address a small part of
> > public safety’s future requirements. As we have argued since the
> > Public Safety Wireless Advisory Committee report of 1996, an
> > additional spectrum allocation is needed,” the six public-safety
> > associations told Stevens and Inouye.
> >
> > Link below ;
> > http://rcrnews.com/news.cms?newsId=26358
> > ---
> > ---
> >
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to