Why not?
Because its greedy.
And when your competitors is unsensitive to the fact that you are greedy, he
combats your spectrum/radio, and you or he has no where to go (spectrum
wise) for a resolution, he will win because he doesn;t have customers yet,
and you do, so you will move to protect your revenue. Basically by using
the full band, you are guaranteeing that anyone that deploys has no choice
but to fight you for spectrum, meaning any channel they choose will
interfere with you. Sure you can go narrow beam antenna, but its jsut a
matter of time until someone bangs into you.
The question that one asks is WHY? If you ahve an option that doesn't take
the whole band, why would you choose one that does? Those decissions don't
usually make friends, and non-friends tend to interfere.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] high throughput backhaul options
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
NOOOOOooooooooooooo
NO one should buy ANY radio anymore that uses the entire band and is
always on. No more WMux fiascos needed.
Why not?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
