On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:43:12 -0800, Marlon K. Schafer wrote > Hi All, > > Forbes asked a good question. I didn't know the answer so I shot > his note off to the FCC's 477 director. Here's the entire conversation: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ellen Burton" <> > To: "Marlon K. Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "477INFO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:49 AM > Subject: RE: [WISPA] Final Form 477 Consideration > > Hi, Marlon, > > For Forbes's question: We are trying to measure those end user > customers who actually get over 256k. If Forbes has merely decided > to advertise in a conservative manner and -- in fact -- 90% of his > 500 or so customers (or about 450 customers) actually get over 256k, > consistently, then the 450 number should be reported. > > For your own question, Marlon: You would include in your Form 477 > all the connections that you sell as "1meg/1meg" because they all operate > above our 200k threshold consistently. When you get to the five "speed > tiers" (columns f though j), it might be easiest to put them all in > column f (i.e., over 200k but less than 2.5meg). But, if you really > know that some number of these connections consistently deliver > 2.5meg or higher, you would put those connections into column g. > > Sorry I haven't been back to you on more general matters, this week, > but we've been swamped and I haven't been able to talk with appropriate > folks here. > > Ellen
That's digging pretty deep into the mechanics of your network. Hmmm, you could get fined if your customer's pages load too fast, it makes you non-compliant with federal regulations.... < bangs head on desk at the stupidity of it all... > -------------------------------------------- Mark Koskenmaki <> Neofast, Inc Broadband for the Walla Walla Valley and Blue Mountains 541-969-8200 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
